.
Intel

Advisory Intelligence: The importance of the ‘S’ in ESG .

Understanding how the 'S' shifts the narrative in ESG

Advisory Intelligence: The importance of the ‘S’ in ESG

Elena Basova, senior analyst at Nasdaq IR Intelligence, outlines why the social aspect of ESG should be a big point of focus for corporates and IROs 

ESG related issues have for some time been the political zeitgeist which have slowly seeped into the economic sphere, making it one of the most fascinating points of focus and development in the investment arena.

Though when ESG is split into its component parts: the ‘E’ – the environment has dominated the narrative, with the ‘G’ – governance – being the bread and butter issue companies must be seen to be dealing with effectively, while the social aspect, making up the ‘S’ has been left behind like Kevin in “Home Alone.”

This however is changing. Elena Basova, senior strategic capital intelligence analyst at Nasdaq in New York, says there has been a shift in the narrative of the ‘S’ in the ESG, which has typically been used by companies for positive visibility when some social or philanthropic deed has been undertaken.

‘The corporate community, regulatory bodies and academic community are now exploring the juxtaposition of ESG and long-term economic success of corporate companies. Therefore the social aspect of ESG is no longer just about philanthropic metrics.’

It turn, this means the ‘S’ now impacts a variety of metrics utilized in the investor’s assessment of the corporate’s long-term performance. ‘Sustainability of performance is one of the primary concerns to investors – who now have to get creative in their ways of assessing it,’ notes Basova.

This comes down to so-called intangible asset creation, which has been an increasing focus of economic innovation in recent years and is only going to increase going forward. Basova explains: ‘An increasing amount of intangible items on the balance sheet, such as brand value, customer loyalty, etc., are metrics hard to quantify for investors. So they have to get creative and dive into the social aspect to be able to determine the value of the investment in front of them. So the approach is no longer just quant orientated but is leading to a more qualitative evaluation.’

Adding to the mix are societal challenges and changes, with the importance of social media and debates around fake news. ‘We are moving into a world where it can be difficult to quantify things,’ notes Basova.

This presents an obvious challenge to the IR professional. ‘We recommend IROs report definitions on certain metrics within ESG as they – the ESG issues – are the ones being discussed the most,’ advises Basova.

But there is also an impetus for the IRO to work across the business to present a more solidified message on the issue of ESG. ‘There could be a disconnect, for example, between the IR department, the corporate secretary and the governance function, or whoever they have in place dealing with these issues,’ notes Basova. ‘So it is about bringing them all together and seeing what can be done from an IRO perspective about how best to communicate the message to those investors who care about these issues.’

In addition, with a huge surge in passive investment this has led to a lot of risk for passive managers. Because although they manage much capital, crucially they cannot divest like an active manger would. Meaning in turn they have long holding periods with passives tied to longer term investments like pension funds and endowments.

‘So they [passives] are going back to the social aspects in their efforts to influence how the companies approach managing those metrics internally – as they tend to have direct impact on the long-term performance,’ observes Basova. And as many of the leading passive managers are major investment behemoths they are likely to be successful in changing the social measurement metrics for the better.

Within this picture, IROs have a fruitful part to play. ‘IROs should proactively and regularly reach out to passive investors who care about social and ESG issues as this can play out favorably during proxy situations,’ notes Basova.

And for corporates the big point of focus should be human capital. BlackRock has been spearheading the connection between ESG – particularly the ‘S’ aspect of it and sustainability of return – with the human capital aspect of the ‘S’ gaining additional attention as a result.

Basova adds ‘There is a need for companies to report on the human capital element and that means diversity, equal opportunity, health and safety, labor relations and supply chain management. That is what they should concentrate on.’ In this way, Basova concludes: ‘ESG has a real world application for social and business benefit.’



NASDAQ IR INTELLIGENCE

Companies across all industries, sectors and regions partner with Nasdaq to maximize the effectiveness of their IR initiatives and enhance shareholder value. Our global team of consultative experts and industry-leading software provide our clients with strategic actionable intelligence and unparalleled visibility into the capital markets for the long term.

Follow us on Twitter: @Nasdaq

Follow us on LinkedIn: Nasdaq

© Copyright 2018 Nasdaq, Inc. The Nasdaq logo and the Nasdaq ‘ribbon’ logo are the registered and unregistered trademarks, or service marks, of Nasdaq, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. This communication being is provided to you by Corporate Solutions, a business of Nasdaq, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, “Nasdaq”), for informational purposes only and is of general character only. None of the information herein constitutes advice, a recommendation, solicitation, invitation or inducement to buy or sell securities of any kind, or as commentary on the value of any security. Before making any investment decision, you should seek independent legal, taxation or financial advice. Nasdaq makes no representation or warranty with respect to this communication or such content and expressly disclaims any implied warranty under law. At the time of publication, the information herein was believed to be accurate, however, such information is subject to change without notice and Nasdaq makes no representation or warranty as to the correctness or completeness of the information.  The information provided in this report remains, unless otherwise stated, the copyright of Nasdaq and may not be used, reproduced, published or copied, in whole or in part,  in any form or for any purpose whatsoever without the express written permission of Nasdaq. This information is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any citizen or resident of, or otherwise located in, any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to any law or regulation or which would subject Nasdaq to any registration or licensing requirements or any other liability within such jurisdiction. By reviewing this document you acknowledge that neither Nasdaq nor any of its third-party providers shall under any circumstance be liable for any lost profits or lost opportunity, indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or punitive damages whatsoever, even if Nasdaq or its third-party providers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Additionally, unless due to willful tortious misconduct or gross negligence, neither Nasdaq nor any of its third-party providers shall have any liability in tort, contract, or otherwise (and as permitted by law, product liability), to you or any third party. This disclaimer is governed by the laws of the State of New York.

Recent posts{{catTitle ? " in " + catTitle : ""}}
{{post.Date | date:'MMM d'}}
Scroll up